VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Cursor vs Relevance AI
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Published Last updated
- Cursor has a free tier; Relevance AI is paid only.
- On privacy, Cursor offers GDPR compliance where Relevance AI does not.
- Cursor is best for businesses needing enterprise-ready coding help; Relevance AI for teams building AI agents into their products.
Cursor
AI Coding
8.4/ 10
Free · Free tier
Best for businesses needing enterprise-ready coding help
Visit CursorSee all AI Coding Assistants →
Relevance AI
AI Agent
7.5/ 10
— · Paid only
Best for teams building AI agents into their products
Visit Relevance AISee all AI Agents →Some “Visit” links are affiliate links. How we earn →
Feature comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 8.4 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Vendor holds SOC 2 | ||
| Vendor holds ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Certifications may only cover business or enterprise plans. Check the vendor’s trust page for your plan.
Cursor comes out ahead — and you can try it free.
Try Cursor freeAffiliate link · how we earn
Pricing
Price checked with vendor on
HobbyFree
IndividualUS$20/mo ≈£15.03/mo
TeamsUS$40/mo ≈£30.06/mo
EnterpriseContact sales
PlusUS$8/mo ≈£6.01/mo
PremiumUS$30/mo ≈£22.55/mo
SuperUS$100/mo ≈£75.15/mo
UltraUS$200/mo ≈£150.31/mo
Enterprise—
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing.
Pros & cons
Cursor
Pros
- +Purpose-built AI code editor
- +Excellent at understanding whole codebase context
- +Natural language code editing
- +Fast and responsive
Cons
- −Separate application from existing IDE workflow
- −Subscription required
- −Newer with smaller community than Copilot
Relevance AI
Pros
- +No-code builder for complex multi-agent workflows
- +Trusted by large enterprises including Canva and Databricks
- +2,000+ integrations including calling and meeting agents
- +Built-in A/B testing and agent evaluations
Cons
- −Enterprise-only pricing — no published self-serve tiers
- −GDPR and SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
- −Not suitable for individuals or small teams
Our take— Cursor wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Cursor scores 8.4/10 to Relevance AI's 7.5/10. Cursor pulls ahead with GDPR compliance and a free tier. Relevance AI counters with API access. Pick Cursor if GDPR compliance matters; pick Relevance AI if you need API access.
Frequently asked questions
Does Cursor train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Cursor does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Does Relevance AI train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Relevance AI does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Are Cursor and Relevance AI GDPR compliant?
Cursor states it is GDPR compliant, while Relevance AI is not recorded as GDPR compliant in our data. Confirm the current position with each vendor if GDPR compliance is important for your use.
Do Cursor and Relevance AI have a free tier?
Cursor offers a free tier, while Relevance AI is paid only. If you want to try before paying, Cursor is the one to start with.
Which has an API, Cursor or Relevance AI?
Relevance AI offers API access, while Cursor is not recorded as offering a public API in our data. For programmatic integration, Relevance AI is the better fit.