VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Published Last updated
- Cursor is cheaper to start — US$8/mo versus US$10/mo for GitHub Copilot.
- Cursor is best for businesses needing enterprise-ready coding help; GitHub Copilot for teams building coding help into their products.
Cursor
AI Coding
8.4/ 10
Free · Free tier
Best for businesses needing enterprise-ready coding help
Visit CursorSee all AI Coding Assistants →
GitHub Copilot
AI Coding
8.5/ 10
Free · Free tier
Best for teams building coding help into their products
Visit GitHub CopilotSee all AI Coding Assistants →Some “Visit” links are affiliate links. How we earn →
Feature comparison
| Feature | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 8.4 / 10 | 8.5 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Vendor holds SOC 2 | ||
| Vendor holds ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Certifications may only cover business or enterprise plans. Check the vendor’s trust page for your plan.
GitHub Copilot comes out ahead — and you can try it free.
Try GitHub Copilot freeAffiliate link · how we earn
Pricing
Price checked with vendor on
HobbyFree
IndividualUS$20/mo ≈£15.03/mo
TeamsUS$40/mo ≈£30.06/mo
EnterpriseContact sales
PlusUS$8/mo ≈£6.01/mo
PremiumUS$30/mo ≈£22.55/mo
SuperUS$100/mo ≈£75.15/mo
UltraUS$200/mo ≈£150.31/mo
FreeFree
ProUS$10/mo ≈£7.52/mo
Pro+US$39/mo ≈£29.31/mo
MaxUS$100/mo ≈£75.15/mo
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing.
Pros & cons
Cursor
Pros
- +Purpose-built AI code editor
- +Excellent at understanding whole codebase context
- +Natural language code editing
- +Fast and responsive
Cons
- −Separate application from existing IDE workflow
- −Subscription required
- −Newer with smaller community than Copilot
GitHub Copilot
Pros
- +Deeply integrated into VS Code and major IDEs
- +Excellent at code completion and boilerplate
- +Strong enterprise security
- +Trained on vast public code
Cons
- −Requires GitHub subscription
- −Can suggest insecure code patterns
- −Less useful for architecture decisions
Our take— GitHub Copilot wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, GitHub Copilot pulls ahead with API access. Cursor stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. GitHub Copilot scores 8.5/10 to Cursor's 8.4/10. If API access matters, go GitHub Copilot; if it doesn't, Cursor.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Cursor or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor is cheaper to start, with its lowest paid plan at US$8/mo versus US$10/mo for GitHub Copilot. These are each vendor's published prices and can change, so check before you buy.
Does Cursor train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Cursor does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Does GitHub Copilot train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, GitHub Copilot does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Are Cursor and GitHub Copilot GDPR compliant?
Based on published vendor information, both Cursor and GitHub Copilot state they are GDPR compliant. Vendor-level compliance does not remove your own obligations when you process personal data through either tool.
Do Cursor and GitHub Copilot have a free tier?
Yes — both Cursor and GitHub Copilot offer a free tier, so you can try each one before committing to a paid plan. Free tiers usually come with usage limits.