VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Cursor vs CrewAI
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Cursor | CrewAI |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 8.4 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| SOC 2 certified | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data | Yes |
Pricing
HobbyFree
Pro£16/mo
Business£32/mo
FreeFree
EnterpriseContact us
Prices in GBP. Verified monthly. Always check the provider's site for the latest.
Pros & cons
Cursor
Pros
- +Purpose-built AI code editor
- +Excellent at understanding whole codebase context
- +Natural language code editing
- +Fast and responsive
Cons
- −Separate application from existing IDE workflow
- −Subscription required
- −Newer with smaller community than Copilot
CrewAI
Pros
- +SOC2 Type II certified (June 2026) — strongest compliance credentials in the agents category
- +Free tier includes 50 workflow executions and a visual editor — no card required
- +Enterprise governance: SSO, RBAC, workload identity, PII redaction, and policy controls
- +Flexible deployment: CrewAI cloud, private VPC, or customer-owned infrastructure
Cons
- −Trains on customer data to improve models — confirmed in Terms of Use section 1.5
- −No visible paid tier between Free (50 executions/month) and Enterprise — no self-serve mid-tier
- −GDPR compliance not confirmed from accessed official pages
Our take— Cursor wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Cursor scores 8.4/10 to CrewAI's 7.5/10. Cursor pulls ahead with GDPR compliance and multi-factor authentication. CrewAI counters with API access. Pick Cursor if GDPR compliance matters; pick CrewAI if you need API access.