VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
AutoGPT vs Make
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Published Last updated
- Make is cheaper to start — US$12/mo versus US$50/mo for AutoGPT.
- On privacy, Make offers GDPR compliance where AutoGPT does not.
- AutoGPT is best for developers who want open-source AI agents; Make for teams building AI agents into their products.
AutoGPT
AI Agent
7.1/ 10
US$50/mo · Paid only
Best for developers who want open-source AI agents
Visit AutoGPTSee all AI Agents →
Make
AI Agent
7.9/ 10
Free · Free tier
Best for teams building AI agents into their products
Visit MakeSee all AI Agents →Some “Visit” links are affiliate links. How we earn →
Feature comparison
| Feature | AutoGPT | Make |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 7.1 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Vendor holds SOC 2 | ||
| Vendor holds ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Certifications may only cover business or enterprise plans. Check the vendor’s trust page for your plan.
Make comes out ahead — and you can try it free.
Try Make freeAffiliate link · how we earn
Pricing
Price checked with vendor on
ProUS$50/mo ≈£37.58/mo
MaxUS$320/mo ≈£240.49/mo
FreeFree
EnterpriseContact sales
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing.
Pros & cons
AutoGPT
Pros
- +Fully open source — self-host for free with Docker
- +Pioneer of the autonomous agent paradigm
- +Maximum flexibility for technical users
- +No vendor lock-in on the self-hosted path
Cons
- −No free hosted tier — cloud plans billed annually only
- −GDPR and SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
- −Team plan listed as 'coming soon' — no multi-user cloud option yet
- −Steeper learning curve than no-code alternatives
Make
Pros
- +More flexible than Zapier for complex workflows
- +Better value at higher volumes
- +Visual workflow builder
- +Strong for technical users
Cons
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Smaller app library
- −AI features less developed
Our take— Make wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Make scores 7.9/10 to AutoGPT's 7.1/10. Make pulls ahead with GDPR compliance and multi-factor authentication. AutoGPT counters with an open-source codebase. Pick Make if GDPR compliance matters; pick AutoGPT if you need an open-source codebase.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, AutoGPT or Make?
Make is cheaper to start, with its lowest paid plan at US$12/mo versus US$50/mo for AutoGPT. These are each vendor's published prices and can change, so check before you buy.
Does AutoGPT train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, AutoGPT does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Does Make train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Make does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Are AutoGPT and Make GDPR compliant?
Make states it is GDPR compliant, while AutoGPT is not recorded as GDPR compliant in our data. Confirm the current position with each vendor if GDPR compliance is important for your use.
Do AutoGPT and Make have a free tier?
Make offers a free tier, while AutoGPT is paid only. If you want to try before paying, Make is the one to start with.