Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing. Prices marked are based on published data and are pending independent verification.
Pros & cons
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Pros
+Agentic coding with multi-step task planning built directly into the editor
+UK GDPR and EEA data rights confirmed in Cognition privacy policy
+Free tier available — Devin Desktop IDE at no cost
+Integrates VS Code and Cursor configurations out of the box
Cons
−Distinct from Devin, Cognition's autonomous AI software engineer — Devin Desktop is the agentic IDE; Devin is a separate autonomous coding agent
−Trains on user code by default — confirmed from Cognition privacy policy
−SOC2 and ISO 27001 not confirmed from official sources
−Teams plan pricing is two-part: £63/mo base plus £31/mo per developer seat — total cost scales with team size
Luma Dream Machine
Pros
+GDPR compliant with EEA/UK data rights (access, correction, deletion)
+High cinematic video quality from both text and image prompts
+Third-party model access alongside native Luma models
+Team and Enterprise plans available for larger organisations
Cons
−No free tier — entry starts at £24/mo (annual billing)
−Uses user content to train AI models
−SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
Our take— Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) pulls ahead with a free tier. Luma Dream Machine stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) scores 7.6/10 to Luma Dream Machine's 7.6/10. Pick Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) if a free tier matters; Luma Dream Machine is the pick if it doesn't.