VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Tabnine vs Lindy
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Tabnine | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 7.5 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| SOC 2 certified | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Pricing
Code Assistant£31/mo
Agentic£47/mo
EnterpriseContact us
L
Plus£24/mo
Pro£79/mo
Max£157/mo
EnterpriseContact us
Prices in GBP. Verified monthly. Always check the provider's site for the latest.
Pros & cons
Tabnine
Pros
- +Strong privacy — can run locally or on-premise
- +Good for enterprise security requirements
- +Supports all major IDEs
- +GDPR compliant
Cons
- −Less capable than Copilot or Cursor on complex tasks
- −Smaller model means less context awareness
- −Interface less polished
Lindy
Pros
- +Explicitly commits to never training models on user data
- +SOC 2 and GDPR certified — strong compliance for UK businesses
- +HIPAA compliant on Enterprise — suitable for health and finance
- +MCP support for broad integrations
Cons
- −No free tier — trial only via Slack invite
- −Pro and Max tiers expensive for solo users
- −Credit-based model makes cost hard to predict
Our take— Lindy wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Lindy pulls ahead with API access. Tabnine stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. Lindy scores 7.9/10 to Tabnine's 7.5/10. Lindy is the call when API access matters — otherwise Tabnine.