VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Sudowrite vs Make
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Sudowrite | Make |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 7.1 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| SOC 2 certified | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Pricing
S
Hobby & Student£8/mo
Professional£17/mo
Max£35/mo
Enterprise—
FreeFree
CoreUS$12/mo
ProUS$21/mo
TeamsUS$38/mo
EnterpriseContact sales
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing. Prices marked are based on published data and are pending independent verification.
Pros & cons
Sudowrite
Pros
- +Explicit commitment to never training on user manuscripts — confirmed on pricing page
- +Specialised fiction tools: character generation, outline, scene expansion
- +Claims no rights over user content or generated output
- +30+ language support across all plans
Cons
- −No free tier — paid plans only
- −GDPR and SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
- −Fiction-only focus — not suited for marketing copy, email, or business writing
Make
Pros
- +More flexible than Zapier for complex workflows
- +Better value at higher volumes
- +Visual workflow builder
- +Strong for technical users
Cons
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Smaller app library
- −AI features less developed
Our take— Make wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Make scores 7.9/10 to Sudowrite's 7.1/10. Make pulls ahead with GDPR compliance and SOC 2 certification. Sudowrite stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. Pick Make if GDPR compliance matters; Sudowrite is the pick if it doesn't.