Prices in GBP. Verified monthly. Always check the provider's site for the latest.
Pros & cons
Luma Dream Machine
Pros
+GDPR compliant with EEA/UK data rights (access, correction, deletion)
+High cinematic video quality from both text and image prompts
+Third-party model access alongside native Luma models
+Team and Enterprise plans available for larger organisations
Cons
−No free tier — entry starts at £24/mo (annual billing)
−Uses user content to train AI models
−SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
QuillBot
Pros
+Free tier paraphrases up to 125 words with no time limit
+9 paraphrase modes including Formal, Simple, Creative, and Expand
+Premium at £4/mo (annual) is the lowest price in the writing category
+Plagiarism checker and AI Detector bundled with Premium
Cons
−GDPR and SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
−Free tier capped at 125 words per paraphrase — limiting for longer content
−Focused on paraphrasing — not a full-document AI writing assistant
Our take— Luma Dream Machine wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Luma Dream Machine pulls ahead with GDPR compliance and enterprise-grade readiness. QuillBot counters with a no-training-on-your-data policy. Luma Dream Machine scores 7.6/10 to QuillBot's 7.3/10. Pick Luma Dream Machine if GDPR compliance matters; pick QuillBot if a no-training-on-your-data policy matters.