Prices in GBP. Verified monthly. Always check the provider's site for the latest.
Pros & cons
Luma Dream Machine
Pros
+GDPR compliant with EEA/UK data rights (access, correction, deletion)
+High cinematic video quality from both text and image prompts
+Third-party model access alongside native Luma models
+Team and Enterprise plans available for larger organisations
Cons
−No free tier — entry starts at £24/mo (annual billing)
−Uses user content to train AI models
−SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
Devin
Pros
+Plans, writes, tests, and ships production code autonomously — confirmed from official product description
+UK GDPR and EEA data rights confirmed in Cognition privacy policy with UK IDTA in use
+Free tier available with selected features — no card required to start
+Integrates with existing codebases and tools including Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) IDE
Cons
−Trains on user code and content by default — confirmed from Cognition privacy policy
−SOC2 and ISO 27001 not confirmed from official sources
−Max plan (£157/month) is the highest per-user price in the agents category
Our take— Devin wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Devin pulls ahead with API access and a free tier. Luma Dream Machine stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. Devin scores 7.8/10 to Luma Dream Machine's 7.6/10. If API access matters, go Devin; if it doesn't, Luma Dream Machine.