VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Lindy vs Relevance AI
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Published Last updated
- On privacy, Lindy offers GDPR compliance where Relevance AI does not.
- Lindy is best for teams building AI agents into their products; Relevance AI for teams building AI agents into their products.
Lindy
AI Agent
7.9/ 10
£24/mo · Paid only
Best for teams building AI agents into their products
Visit LindySee all AI Agents →
Relevance AI
AI Agent
7.5/ 10
— · Paid only
Best for teams building AI agents into their products
Visit Relevance AISee all AI Agents →Some “Visit” links are affiliate links. How we earn →
Feature comparison
| Feature | Lindy | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 7.9 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Vendor holds SOC 2 | ||
| Vendor holds ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Certifications may only cover business or enterprise plans. Check the vendor’s trust page for your plan.
Lindy comes out ahead in our comparison.
Visit LindyAffiliate link · how we earn
Pricing
Price checked with vendor on
Enterprise—
3,000 creditsUS$29.99/mo ≈£22.54/mo
4,000 creditsUS$39.99/mo ≈£30.05/mo
5,000 creditsUS$49.99/mo ≈£37.57/mo
6,000 creditsUS$59.99/mo ≈£45.08/mo
8,000 creditsUS$79.99/mo ≈£60.12/mo
15,000 creditsUS$99.99/mo ≈£75.15/mo
20,000 creditsUS$149.99/mo ≈£112.72/mo
35,000 creditsUS$199.99/mo ≈£150.30/mo
45,000 creditsUS$299.99/mo ≈£225.45/mo
Small teams - 70,000 creditsUS$399.98/mo ≈£300.60/mo
Small teams - 105,000 creditsUS$599.97/mo ≈£450.90/mo
Small teams - 175,000 creditsUS$999.95/mo ≈£751.50/mo
Growing teams - 350,000 creditsUS$1,999.90/mo ≈£1,503/mo
Growing teams - 700,000 creditsUS$3,999.80/mo ≈£3,006/mo
Growing teams - 1,750,000 creditsUS$9,999.50/mo ≈£7,515/mo
Enterprise—
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing.
Pros & cons
Lindy
Pros
- +Explicitly commits to never training models on user data
- +SOC 2 and GDPR certified — strong compliance for UK businesses
- +HIPAA compliant on Enterprise — suitable for health and finance
- +MCP support for broad integrations
Cons
- −No free tier — trial only via Slack invite
- −Pro and Max tiers expensive for solo users
- −Credit-based model makes cost hard to predict
Relevance AI
Pros
- +No-code builder for complex multi-agent workflows
- +Trusted by large enterprises including Canva and Databricks
- +2,000+ integrations including calling and meeting agents
- +Built-in A/B testing and agent evaluations
Cons
- −Enterprise-only pricing — no published self-serve tiers
- −GDPR and SOC2 not confirmed from official sources
- −Not suitable for individuals or small teams
Our take— Lindy wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Lindy pulls ahead with GDPR compliance. Relevance AI stays close but doesn't lead on any single attribute here. Lindy scores 7.9/10 to Relevance AI's 7.5/10. Pick Lindy if GDPR compliance matters; Relevance AI is the pick if it doesn't.
Frequently asked questions
Does Lindy train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Lindy does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Does Relevance AI train on your data?
Based on published vendor information, Relevance AI does not train its models on your data. Policies can differ by plan and change over time, so it is worth confirming the current terms on the vendor's site.
Are Lindy and Relevance AI GDPR compliant?
Lindy states it is GDPR compliant, while Relevance AI is not recorded as GDPR compliant in our data. Confirm the current position with each vendor if GDPR compliance is important for your use.
Do Lindy and Relevance AI have a free tier?
No — neither Lindy nor Relevance AI offers a free tier, so a paid plan is required to get started with either.
Which has an API, Lindy or Relevance AI?
Both Lindy and Relevance AI offer API access, so developers can build either into their own products and workflows.