VS
Head-to-Head Comparison
Gamma vs Make
An honest, side-by-side breakdown of pricing, features, and security — so you can pick the right tool.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Gamma | Make |
|---|---|---|
| CompareMyAI score | 8.0 / 10 | 7.9 / 10 |
| Free tier | ||
| API access | ||
| Open source | ||
| Enterprise ready | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| SOC 2 certified | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| MFA supported | ||
| Trains on your data |
Pricing
G
FreeFree
Plus£7/mo
Pro£14/mo
Ultra£71/mo
FreeFree
CoreUS$12/mo
ProUS$21/mo
TeamsUS$38/mo
EnterpriseContact sales
Always check the provider's site for the latest pricing. Prices marked are based on published data and are pending independent verification.
Pros & cons
Gamma
Pros
- +SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR-compliant with DPA available
- +Generous free tier with no credit card required
- +Exports to PDF, PPTX, and Google Slides for broad compatibility
- +Creates presentations, documents, and web pages from a single prompt
Cons
- −Free plan limited to 400 one-time credits — not recurring
- −Advanced AI image models require Plus tier or above
- −Less suited to highly branded enterprise templates
Make
Pros
- +More flexible than Zapier for complex workflows
- +Better value at higher volumes
- +Visual workflow builder
- +Strong for technical users
Cons
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Smaller app library
- −AI features less developed
Our take— Gamma wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Gamma takes the overall edge, though Make offers ISO 27001 certification. Gamma scores 8.0/10 to Make's 7.9/10. Pick Make if ISO 27001 certification matters — Gamma takes it overall on our scoring, but the gap is narrow.