Prices in GBP. Verified monthly. Always check the provider's site for the latest.
Pros & cons
Amazon Q Developer
Pros
+GDPR and SOC2 certified — inherits AWS enterprise compliance stack
+Pro tier automatically opted out of data training — confirmed on pricing page
+Deep AWS integration: understands IAM, CloudFormation, and AWS APIs natively
+Free tier includes 50 agentic requests/month — usable at no cost
Cons
−Free tier uses data for service improvement by default — opt-out required
−Most valuable inside the AWS ecosystem; limited appeal outside it
−Pro IP indemnity and admin dashboard only on paid plan
Descript
Pros
+SOC2 Type II and GDPR compliant — strongest compliance credentials in the video category
+Transcript-based editing removes filler words and errors as easily as editing a document
+No AI training on user content by default — explicit opt-in required (confirmed from security page)
+API included with all paid plans for automating transcription, captions, and publishing
Cons
−End-user MFA not confirmed — employee systems only per security page
−ISO 27001 not confirmed from official sources
−AI credits cap at 1,500/month on Business plan — may deplete with heavy video generation use
Our take— Descript wins
Based on our comparison of published pricing, features, and compliance data, Descript pulls ahead with a no-training-on-your-data policy. Amazon Q Developer counters with multi-factor authentication. Descript scores 8.0/10 to Amazon Q Developer's 7.8/10. Pick Descript if a no-training-on-your-data policy matters; pick Amazon Q Developer if multi-factor authentication matters.